Segment
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Premium2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ was done in 2020, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (97%) of the Nokian WR D4 also have B wet ratings.
# | GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Premium2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
2. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 94%
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
2. Nokian WR D4 78%
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
2. Nokian WR D4 71%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
2. Nokian WR D4 67%
2. Nokian WR D4 86%
1. Nokian WR D4 79%
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
1. Nokian WR D4 82%