Segment
2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Nokian Powerproof
Table of contents:
| # | GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
| Nokian Powerproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this text, we will compare two highly-rated summer tyres - the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the Nokian Powerproof. Both tyres come from well-known manufacturers, GoodYear and Nokian, and are designed to provide excellent performance on various surfaces.
The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is a successor to the popular Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and has been replaced by the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. Our rating for this tyre is 94%, meaning it is one of the top choices for summer tyres. This tyre is mostly produced in Slovenia and Germany.
On the other hand, the Nokian Powerproof is a Finnish-made tyre with an 85% rating, demonstrating a strong performance as a summer tyre. Unlike the GoodYear model, there is no newer tyre that has replaced it.
In various tests conducted by leading auto magazines, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 consistently ranked higher than the Nokian Powerproof. Here is a summary of their positions in mutual tests:
- Autozeitung: GoodYear (1st place, 10 tyres tested) | Nokian (6th place)
- AutoMotorSport: GoodYear (1st place, 11 tyres tested) | Nokian (7th place)
- Autobild: GoodYear (2nd place, 11 tyres tested) | Nokian (7th place)
- ADAC: GoodYear (3rd place, 16 tyres tested) | Nokian (11th place)
- Gute-Fahrt: GoodYear (2nd place, 10 tyres tested) | Nokian (4th place)
- Autobild (2nd test): GoodYear (1st place, 10 tyres tested) | Nokian (4th place)
Highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre:
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5:
- Strengths: Excellent aquaplaning resistance, wet braking performance, dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise, comfort, wet handling, price-value, mileage, grass traction, and wet circle cornering.
- Weaknesses: No specific weaknesses were reported in the tests.
Nokian Powerproof:
- Strengths: Wet braking, noise, interior noise, handling on gravel, and wet handling.
- Weaknesses: Lower overall ranking in tests, indicating weaker performance in some areas compared to the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5.
In conclusion, based on test results and expert opinions, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 outperforms the Nokian Powerproof in most categories and across different tests. With its higher overall rating of 94% and consistently higher rankings in mutual tests, the GoodYear tyre is an excellent choice for a summer tyre that provides outstanding performance in various conditions.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 92 | 93 | 93 | ||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Test winner | 92 | 93 | 92 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 85 | 83 | 87 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,3 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Very good | 9,4 | 9,2 | 6 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 6,8 | 7,8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 33,2 | 30,8 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,7 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Very good - | |||||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Very good - | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | |||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
