Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Goodride Sport SA-37 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride Sport SA-37 vs. Michelin Primacy 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Goodride (49%). In this particular case, the Michelin Primacy 4 has a better rating of 84% compared to 3% of the Goodride Sport SA-37. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Sport SA-37 and the Primacy 4 were tested.
| # | Goodride Sport SA-37 | Michelin Primacy 4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry steering response
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Goodride Sport SA-37 | 174 | 73 | 101 | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 247 | 127 | 120 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||