Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Goodride Sport SA-37 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride Sport SA-37 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Goodride (40%). The first tyre test of Goodride Sport SA-37 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Sport SA-37 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Goodride Sport SA-37
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Goodride Sport SA-37 | 174 | 73 | 101 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Test winner | 264 | 137 | 127 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Goodride Sport SA-37 | 36,3 | 33,5 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
