Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than Giti (32%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 55% compared to 41% of the Giti Gitiwinter W2. The first tyre test of Giti Gitiwinter W2 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 245/45 R18 test, where both the winter W2 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Giti Gitiwinter W2
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 37.4 | 29.2 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | |||||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 2,0 | ||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,6 | ||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,7 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | 37,9 | 31,2 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||