Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Giti Gitisynergy H2 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Gitisynergy H2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Giti Gitisynergy H2
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Giti Gitisynergy H2 and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 are two summer tyres from leading tyre manufacturers Giti and Kleber respectively. Both tyres are well-known in the market but exhibit different strengths and weaknesses in various tyre tests.
The Giti Gitisynergy H2 is particularly praised for its safe wet handling and short dry braking distances, along with its modest pricing. The tyre did show shortcomings like a tendency to understeer on a dry surface and very high rolling resistance. Unfortunately, in the tests consulted, there was a lack of ranking for the Giti Gitisynergy H2 by Autobild, with a lower ranking position of 29 by ADAC. As of now, no successor model replaced the Giti Gitisynergy H2 model.
On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 shows distinguished performance in comfort and exterior noise levels according to the Autobild test, with the tyre ranking 12th out of a total of 51 tyres tested. This tyre shows good environmental figures, tread life, abrasion and efficiency, although not fully balanced and displays weaknesses on a wet surface. The ADAC tyre test also ranked it in 12th position out of 50. Further, in another Autobild test, it showed good aquaplaning characteristics, short wet and dry braking distances, good driving comfort and quiet running noise. However, noticeable are grip weaknesses in wet conditions, significantly delayed steering response and understeery handling on dry surfaces. There is no newer tyre model that has replaced the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 as of yet.
In conclusion, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 seems to outperform the Giti Gitisynergy H2 in overall test results, especially in areas such as comfort, noise levels, and aquaplaning characteristics. Nevertheless, the Giti Gitisynergy H2 brings value for money and offers reliable performance in certain areas like wet handling and short dry braking distances.
Therefore, if the decision is based purely on the test ranks and individual strengths, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 appears to be the better choice. However, the ultimate decision should take into consideration the specific needs and preferences of the driver, and the tyre’s performance in those areas.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Giti Gitisynergy H2 16.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Giti Gitisynergy H2 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Giti Gitisynergy H2 | 36,6 | 29,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 37,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Giti Gitisynergy H2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,8 | 3,4 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,1 | 2,8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
