Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle2. Giti Gitisport S2 Lowcost
# | Giti Gitisport S2
| Falken Azenis FK520
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this article, we will compare two summer tyres - the Giti Gitisport S2 and the Falken Azenis FK520. Both tyres are high-performance and offer a good value for consumers seeking quality tyres in the Ultra High Performance (UHP) category.
Starting with the Giti Gitisport S2, a product from Giti, manufactured in China. This tyre is described as having excellent aquaplaning properties and quiet road noise. Test results from Autozeitung and SportAuto place it on 9th and 10th positions respectively. However, Gitisport S2 doesn't score well in the Autobild test, where it was placed 19th out of 50 tyres. While testers appreciated its aquaplaning safety and quite operational noise, it was also noted that it has a relatively long braking distance and less balanced handling on dry roads.
On the other hand, Falken Azenis FK520, made by Falken in Turkey, ranks significantly higher in multiple tests. Autozeitung ranked it in 6th place, while SportAuto positioned Falken's offering at 7th place. This tyre also performed impressively in the Autobild test, securing 8th amongst 50 tyres. Testers had highlighted its good braking on wet surfaces, safe aquaplaning characteristics, and superior comfort. However, the tyre was slightly criticised for its less immediate steering response and somewhat indifferent balance on wet surfaces.
On comparing the test summaries, it is clear that overall, Falken Azenis FK520 has performed better in the tests. It scores high on safety during aquaplaning, comfort, and noise reduction. However, there are some minor issues, particularly regarding steering response.
The Giti Gitisport S2 shows decent aquaplaning safety but shows a clear deficit when it comes to braking distance and handling on dry roads.
Take into consideration that both tyres have exceptional aquaplaning safety features. The Falken Azenis FK520, with its better overall performance and high comfort levels, appears to be the superior choice for those prioritizing safety and comfort. Although the Giti Gitisport S2 has strengths, particularly in aquaplaning safety, its other downsides make it slightly less appealing.
In conclusion, based on multiple reputable tests, Falken's Azenis FK520 takes the lead. However, both tyres are recommended for drivers prioritizing safety and comfort.
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle2. Giti Gitisport S2 Lowcost
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended2. Giti Gitisport S2 Satisfactory
1. Giti Gitisport S2 Satisfactory2. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
Name | Rating | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | vynikající | ||||||
Giti Gitisport S2 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | vynikající | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
Giti GitiSport S2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 3+ | |||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2+ | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | vynikající | 2+ | 1- | ||||
Giti GitiSport S2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | ||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | vítěz testu | ||||||
Giti Gitisport S2 Rating: Recommended for economical driving | doporučené pro úspornou jízdu | ||||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | ||||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
Giti Gitisport S2 | 64.2 | 28.1 | |||||
Falken Azenis FK520 | 60.7 | 27 | |||||
Show test details |