Segment
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. Sava Eskimo S3+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Fulda (42%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the Eskimo S3+ were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (83%) of the Sava Eskimo S3+ also have C wet ratings.
| # | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Sava Eskimo S3+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
