14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Fulda (42%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 24% of the Fulda Kristall Montero 3. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.

#	Fulda Kristall Montero 3 /24%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%

Dimensions	R13 - R16	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 28

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 10.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 17.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 13.25

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 2022

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Fulda
Kristall Montero 3

90%

Snow traction

1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 91%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 89%

Snow handling

1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

Dry

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Fulda
Kristall Montero 3

55%

Dry braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 67%

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Fulda
Kristall Montero 3

48%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 54%

Wet handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 30%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 59%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 C

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Fulda
Kristall Montero 3

78%

Ice braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 78%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 185/65 R15

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	dobré	1,7	1,9	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,5	1,5
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: Sufficient	dostatečné	3,7	3,6	1,9	2,3	2,0	2,9	1,5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2,7	2,6	2,0	2,5	2,4	2,7	2,0
Show test details

Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands