Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control SUV vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Vredestein (53%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro has a better rating of 81% compared to 59% of the Fulda Kristall Control SUV. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Kristall Control SUV and the Wintrac Pro were tested.
| # | Fulda Kristall Control SUV | Vredestein Wintrac Pro | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended
Comfort
(Overall rating)Interior noise
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
| Fulda Kristall Control SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,1 | 2,6 | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Show test details | |||||||