Segment
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
Comparison: Fulda Conveo Trac 2 vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (42%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda Conveo Trac 2 and Kumho PorTran KC53, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Fulda Conveo Trac 2 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Kumho PorTran KC53 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Fulda Conveo Trac 2
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
