Segment
1. Michelin Agilis+ Premium2. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Conveo Tour 2 vs. Michelin Agilis+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Fulda (69%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda Conveo Tour 2 and Michelin Agilis+, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Conveo Tour 2 and the Agilis+ were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Fulda Conveo Tour 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 79% of Michelin Agilis+ has B rating.
| # | Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Michelin Agilis+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Agilis+ 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Michelin Agilis+ Rating: Poor | 4,9 | 2,9 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
