Segment
1. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Conveo Tour 2 vs. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Maxxis (67%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda Conveo Tour 2 and Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Conveo Tour 2 and the Vansmart MCV3+ were tested.
| # | Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | |
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,7 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,3 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
