Segment
2. Fortune FSR901 Lowcost
Comparison: Fortune FSR901 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortune) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Fortune (31%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 88% compared to 31% of the Fortune FSR901. The first tyre test of Fortune FSR901 was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the FSR901 and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 68% of Fortune FSR901 has E wet grip rating, whereas 82% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B rating.
| # | Fortune FSR901 | GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Fortune FSR901 | 36,3 | 25,3 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 34,4 | 24,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||