Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Fortune FSR901 Lowcost
Comparison: Fortune FSR901 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortune) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Fortune (31%). But when it comes to comparing Fortune FSR901 and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Fortune FSR901 was done in 2020, compared to 2015 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the FSR901 and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Fortune FSR901 has E wet grip rating, whereas 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C rating.
| # | Fortune FSR901
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Fortune FSR901 | 36,3 | 25,3 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 37,9 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||