Segment
1. Fortune FSR901 Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Fortune FSR901 vs. Barum Polaris 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortune) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Fortune (31%). The first tyre test of Fortune FSR901 was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Barum Polaris 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the FSR901 and the Polaris 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Fortune FSR901 has E wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Barum Polaris 5 has C rating.
| # | Fortune FSR901
| Barum Polaris 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Barum Polaris 5 14.82
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Fortune FSR901 | 36,3 | 25,3 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
