Segment
2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Firestone (60%). The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 83% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B rating.
# | Firestone Winterhawk 3
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 37,9 | ||||||
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 34,4 | 24,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 34,3 | 25,5 | |||||
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 30,6 | 24,3 | |||||
Show test details |