Segment
2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Firestone (65%). The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental WinterContact TS 860 has B rating.
# | Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Continental WinterContact TS 860
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 34,3 | 25,5 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 31,5 | 24,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good | dobré | 1,7 | 2,3 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 38,2 | 27,8 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,5 | 27,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | ||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 36,3 | 27,9 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 33,5 | 27,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good | dobré | 1,8 | 2,2 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 39,8 | 27,5 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,2 | 25,6 | |||||
Show test details |