Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Firestone (60%). The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
# | Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 37,9 | ||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 34,3 | 25,5 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
Show test details |