Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4
Table of contents:
| # | Firestone Roadhawk
| Michelin Primacy 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this article, we will be comparing two popular summer tyres, the Firestone Roadhawk, and the Michelin Primacy 4. These tyres have been put to the test by various automotive organizations like ADAC, Autobild, and Autozeitung, and we'll be summarizing their strengths and weaknesses, as well as their overall performance in mutual tests.
Firestone Roadhawk
The Firestone Roadhawk is a summer tyre with an overall rating of 71%. In the 2022 ADAC test, it ranked 17th out of 17 tyres, with its best features being dry braking and wet circle cornering. Autobild also tested this tyre in 2021 and found its strengths to be dry handling, wet handling, and wet side guides, positioning it 10th out of 53 tested tyres. Finally, in the 2021 Autozeitung test, it ranked 12th out of 20 tyres, showing a strong dry steering response. Overall, the key strengths of the Firestone Roadhawk are its low fuel consumption, dry handling, and wet handling, while critics point out its weakness on wet surfaces and increased wear.
Michelin Primacy 4
The Michelin Primacy 4 is a touring summer tyre that replaced the previous model, Michelin Primacy 3, and has an overall rating of 90%. In the 2022 ADAC test, it ranked 5th out of 17 tyres, excelling in dry braking, wet circle cornering, safety, and mileage. Autobild tested the Michelin Primacy 4 also in 2022, ranking it 5th out of 53 tyres, highlighting its comfort and dry handling. Additionally, in the 2021 Autozeitung test, the tyre placed 3rd out of 20 tyres, with a strong wet circle cornering performance. The Primacy 4 has since been replaced by the Michelin Primacy 4+.
The Michelin Primacy 4 stands out with its excellent dry and wet handling, impressive mileage, and aquaplaning resistance. Furthermore, it exhibits high levels of comfort and low levels of wear. However, it has a higher price compared to some competitors.
Conclusion
Overall, the Michelin Primacy 4 is the clear winner in mutual tests against the Firestone Roadhawk. Of particular note is its superior handling capabilities on both dry and wet surfaces, impressive safety features, and excellent wear resistance, making it a well-rounded and high-quality summer tyre. While the Firestone Roadhawk delivers decent performance, it falls short in wet handling and wear resistance, detracting from its overall appeal.
For drivers looking for a summer tyre with a combination of performance, comfort, and safety, the Michelin Primacy 4 is a strong choice. Its strengths more than justify its higher price and make this tyre an excellent investment for a smooth and reliable driving experience. Furthermore, motorists keen to stay updated with the latest tyre technology can consider the Michelin Primacy 4+ for even more enhanced performance.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,7 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,2 | 3,7 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 | 36,2 | 29,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 | 35,8 | 30,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Poor | 4,9 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | |||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 1,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 121 | 75 | 121 | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 247 | 127 | 120 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
