Segment
1. Dunlop Sport All Season Premium2. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Dunlop Sport All Season
Table of contents:
| # | Firestone Multiseason 2
| Dunlop Sport All Season
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Firestone Multiseason 2 and the Dunlop Sport All Season are two kinds of tyres that are currently in the market, each has its features, strengths and weaknesses. They both offer unique driving experiences and are designed by different manufacturers: Firestone and Dunlop. Let's compare them based on different tests conducted.
The Firestone Multiseason 2 scored a 58% overall rating in our tests which proved its great features like rolling resistance. These are said to provide a stable driving behaviour on both snow and wet terrains along with satisfactory fuel efficiency due to their low rolling resistance. However, its average aquaplaning abilities have been noted by Autobild and also shown understeering with limited mileage in dry and snowy conditions.
On the other hand, the Dunlop Sport All Season obtained a rating of 62%. In mutual tests, it ranked higher - 6th out of 32 tyres in the Autobild test, whereas the Firestone Multiseason 2 took the 16th spot. The Dunlop Sport All Season stood out in parameters like comfort, wet circle cornering, dry handling, and aquaplaning resistance. The tyre was praised for its balanced handling in wet and dry conditions, low-rolling resistance, and exceptional ride comfort. The major downside involves understeering in snowy conditions, mediocre aquaplaning characteristics, and extended dry braking distance.
When scrutinised by the Autoklub ČR, Firestone Multiseason 2 secured the 6th position out of 10 tyres tested, while the Dunlop Sport All Season was just behind in the 7th place. A broader analysis revealed that both tyres could improve in specific areas such as dry braking distances and aquaplaning performance.
In conclusion, both tyres have their strengths - the Firestone Multiseason 2 has lower rolling resistance and the Dunlop Sport All Season boasts superior comfort and better handling. However, the Dunlop Sport All Season outperforms the Firestone Multiseason 2 in overall tests results. Therefore, the choice between the two will depend on your driving conditions and preferences.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Dunlop Sport All Season Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Dunlop Sport All Season Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41.8 | 47.9 | |||||
| Dunlop Sport All Season | 42.5 | 47.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | ||||||
| Dunlop Sport All Season Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 102.7 | 104,8 | 104,5 | 102,7 | |||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 99,5 | 100,1 | 99,6 | 99,9 | |||
| Dunlop Sport All Season | 98,7 | 100,3 | 100,4 | 96,4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 45,9 | 48,9 | |||||
| Dunlop Sport All Season | 44,6 | 46,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 3+ | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Dunlop Sport All Season Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |
| Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2 | 2 | |
| Dunlop Sport All Season Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 42,4 | 54,1 | |||||
| Dunlop Sport All Season | 41,7 | 51,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
