Segment
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Ziex ZE914A vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (60%). But when it comes to comparing Falken Ziex ZE914A and Kumho PorTran KC53, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken Ziex ZE914A has A wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Kumho PorTran KC53 has C rating.
| # | Falken Ziex ZE914A
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
