Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Falken Sincera SN110 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Sincera SN110 vs. Continental EcoContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Falken (68%). In this particular case, the Continental EcoContact 6 has a better rating of 48% compared to 36% of the Falken Sincera SN110. The first tyre test of Falken Sincera SN110 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the Sincera SN110 and the EcoContact 6 were tested.
| # | Falken Sincera SN110
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R13 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Falken Sincera SN110 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Falken Sincera SN110 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | ||
| Falken Sincera SN110 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,7 | 3,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
