Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Falken (58%). But when it comes to comparing Falken EuroWinter VAN01 and Michelin AGILIS ALPIN, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Falken EuroWinter VAN01 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the EuroWinter VAN01 and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested.
# | Falken EuroWinter VAN01
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended
1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,3 | 3,2 | 4,0 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |