Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Table of contents:
| # | Falken Azenis FK510
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Here is a text comparison of two summer tyres: the Falken Azenis FK510 and the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127. Both are high-performance options designed to deliver an exceptional driving experience for high-powered vehicles during the summer months.
The Falken Azenis FK510, made in Japan and Turkey, is rated at 90% on our website. This tyre is a summer tyre with no sub-type. While there are no previous models listed, it has been replaced by the Falken Azenis FK520. On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is a South Korean-made Ultra-High Performance (UUHP) summer tyre with an 87% rating. This tyre is a popular choice for various car manufacturers and is used as the first equipment on select models of Audi Q8, Audi SQ8, Porsche Cayenne, and BMW X3.
In mutual tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 generally outperforms the Falken Azenis FK510. For example, in the Autobild test, the K127 ranked 3rd out of 53 tyres, with strengths in dry braking, exterior noise, wet braking, and wet handling. In contrast, the Azenis FK510 ranked 6th. The FK510 had strengths in Aquaplaning - cross, comfort, exterior noise, price/value, and rolling resistance. In AutoMotorSport's tests, the K127 ranked 3rd out of 10 tyres, excelling in dry lane changing, wet braking, and wet handling. Meanwhile, the FK510 ranked 8th in these tests. In Autozeitung's test, the FK510 ranked 5th out of 10 tyres, while the K127 ranked 9th.
Regarding strengths and weaknesses, the Falken Azenis FK510 performed well in terms of grip in wet and dry conditions, but it had inferior wet braking performance and could be better suited for less demanding driving situations. Additionally, this tyre may have deficits in aquaplaning resistance, dry braking, and balance.
In contrast, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 features excellent dry and wet handling and braking, low exterior noise, low rolling resistance, and attractive pricing. However, this tyre has limited safety reserves during curve aquaplaning.
In summary, based on the test results and rankings, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 seems to be a better overall performer compared to the Falken Azenis FK510. However, the FK510 does offer better comfort, price/value, and rolling resistance attributes. If you are more concerned with performance and safety, then the K127 would be the better choice. On the other hand, if comfort and value are higher priorities for you, the FK510 might be more suitable. Ultimately, the decision will depend on your specific driving needs and preferences. Visit Falken and Hankook for more information on these tyres and their manufacturers.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vynikající | 9,0 | 9,7 | 9,4 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | dobré | 7,5 | 7,0 | 6,3 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Very good | velmi dobré | 8,5 | 8,0 | 6,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 92 | vítěz testu | 93 | 93 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Highly recommended | 86 | velmi doporučeno | 89 | 83 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 78 | 69 | 87 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 1- | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,0 | |
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 29 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 35,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | ||||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | ||||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
