Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
| # | Falken Azenis FK510
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When comparing the Falken Azenis FK510 and the Firestone Roadhawk it's important to dissect their respective strengths and weaknesses. These two summer tyres have been put through rigorous testing, and they have each shown unique qualities worth highlighting.
Bearing the seal of Japanese-Turkish manufacturing, the Falken Azenis FK510 scored a commendable rating of 79% in our tests. As a summer tyre, it has exhibited exceptional performance in wet handling and showed impressively low interior noise, earning it the top position among 17 tyres in the ADAC test. Moreover, the Falken Azenis FK510 excelled in providing great value for money, while demonstrating beneficial aspects like low exterior noise and rolling resistance. However, the model's increased fuel consumption was noted as a slight downside. This model has since been succeeded by the Falken Azenis FK520, which carries over many of its strengths. Visit the Falken manufacturer page to further explore this tyre.
The Firestone Roadhawk on the other hand, managed to earn a 70% rating in our assessment. In terms of strengths, this model successfully offers lower fuel consumption compared to its competitor. However, its cyclical performance isn't without drawbacks. The Firestone Roadhawk faced criticism for its weaknesses on dry roads and particularly poor performance on wet surfaces, which led to its 17th place in the ADAC test out of 17 tyres. Furthermore, an increased wear and tear was noticed. Firestone is yet to release a replacement for this model, but you can delve deeper into its characteristics on the Firestone manufacturer page.
In the overall tests, the Falken Azenis FK510 clearly outmatches the Firestone Roadhawk with superior handling on dry and wet surfaces and lower noise levels. However, potential buyers should consider the higher fuel consumption of the FK510. On the flipside, although the Firestone Roadhawk does offer lower fuel usage, it significantly trails in other important areas such as wet and dry handling.
In summary, for those looking for superior overall performance, the Falken Azenis FK510 emerges as a more successful tyre. However, for users seeking lower fuel consumption, the Firestone Roadhawk may certainly be worth considering, bearing in mind its overall inferior ranking in mutual tests.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,8 | 2,0 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 4,9 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 1- | |||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 34,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 29 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 32 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||