Segment
1. Evergreen EH 226 Lowcost2. Viking Protech NewGen Lowcost
Comparison: Evergreen EH 226 vs. Viking Protech NewGen
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Viking summer tyres are slightly better rated (25%) than Evergreen (1%). The first tyre test of Evergreen EH 226 was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Viking Protech NewGen first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the EH 226 and the Protech NewGen were tested.
| # | Evergreen EH 226 | Viking Protech NewGen | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Protech NewGen Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Evergreen EH 226 ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Evergreen EH 226 Rating: Poor | 2,7 | ||||||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Good | 2,5 | 3,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||