check Evergreen EH 226 availability
Table of contents:
Achievements
Best
Aquaplaning - cross
1/1
Best
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1/1
Best
Dry braking
1/1
Best
Exterior noise
1/1
Best
Wet braking
1/1
Timeline
2023
Evergreen EH 226 was launched
2023
Evergreen EH 226 was tested 1x (ADAC)
Sizes
Similar tires
Comparison: tyres similar to Evergreen EH 226
Evergreen EH 226 in tyre tests
All tyre tests where Evergreen EH 226 was featured:All tests
ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16
poor
Ranked #47 of 50
Finishing 47th out of 50 competitors, the Evergreen EH 226 had significant shortcomings that resulted in a final rating of 'Poor.' Notably, the tire exhibited low wear and a decent mileage, which were among the few positives. However, it fell short in several critical areas. Its performance on dry roads was unbalanced, displaying considerable weaknesses. More alarmingly, on wet roads, it demonstrated dangerous deficiencies, particularly in braking and handling, which markedly affected its overall safety assessment. The tire's behavior in terms of environmental impact also left much to be desired. Despite a satisfactory fuel consumption rate and a heavier than average weight which contributed to a satisfactory evaluation in environmental impact, its sustainability aspect was notably inadequate, attributed mainly to its manufacturing process and lifecycle. The Evergreen EH 226 struggled with precise steering response, requiring frequent corrections in cornering and exhibiting tendencies to oversteer during evasive maneuvers. Its braking distance was only considered satisfactory compared to the rest of the field. On wet surfaces, its inadequacies were even more pronounced, with a poor grip level leading to understeer or oversteer, and its aquaplaning performance only managing a satisfactory rating. This comprehensive analysis underscores the tire's significant need for improvement in both safety and environmental sustainability.
poor
Ranked #47 of 50
Finishing 47th out of 50 competitors, the Evergreen EH 226 had significant shortcomings that resulted in a final rating of 'Poor.' Notably, the tire exhibited low wear and a decent mileage, which were among the few positives. However, it fell short in several critical areas. Its performance on dry roads was unbalanced, displaying considerable weaknesses. More alarmingly, on wet roads, it demonstrated dangerous deficiencies, particularly in braking and handling, which markedly affected its overall safety assessment. The tire's behavior in terms of environmental impact also left much to be desired. Despite a satisfactory fuel consumption rate and a heavier than average weight which contributed to a satisfactory evaluation in environmental impact, its sustainability aspect was notably inadequate, attributed mainly to its manufacturing process and lifecycle. The Evergreen EH 226 struggled with precise steering response, requiring frequent corrections in cornering and exhibiting tendencies to oversteer during evasive maneuvers. Its braking distance was only considered satisfactory compared to the rest of the field. On wet surfaces, its inadequacies were even more pronounced, with a poor grip level leading to understeer or oversteer, and its aquaplaning performance only managing a satisfactory rating. This comprehensive analysis underscores the tire's significant need for improvement in both safety and environmental sustainability.
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Evergreen EH 226 | 2,7 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Test ratings distribution
| 0% (1x) |
|---|
| Poor |
| 1x |
Ratings x Wheel size
| R16 |
|---|
| 0% (1x) |
Ratings x Width
| 205/xx Rxx |
|---|
| 0% (1x) |
