Segment
1. Evergreen EH 226 Lowcost2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
Comparison: Evergreen EH 226 vs. Nexen N Fera Primus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Evergreen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Evergreen (1%). The first tyre test of Evergreen EH 226 was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Nexen N Fera Primus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the EH 226 and the N Fera Primus were tested.
| # | Evergreen EH 226
| Nexen N Fera Primus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nexen N Fera Primus 12.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | |||||
| Evergreen EH 226 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 2,7 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Good | dobré | 3,1 | 2,3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
