Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Esa) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Esa (49%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 88% compared to 49% of the Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro. The first tyre test of Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Tecar Supergrip Pro and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested.
| # | Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 3,1 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,1 | 3,4 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
