Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Let's dive into a comparison of the Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 summer tyres. These tyres, manufactured by Esa+Tecar and Kleber respectively, offer unique features and performances. Utilising data from numerous tyre tests, we've evaluated these models on various parameters to bring you an informative comparison.
The Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro, earning an overall rating of 65%, is praised for excellent mileage as reflected in its 7th position in the ADAC test. Reviewers have commended its good performance on wet roads, high efficiency and favourable environmental footprint. However, it does show significant weaknesses on dry roads, according to summaries from autoklubcr 2023 and adac 2021 tests.
In contrast, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 scored higher with an overall rating of 76%. It clinched the 11th spot in ADAC tests, lauded for its low exterior noise. AutoBild 2022 lauded its superior aquaplaning properties, short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces, comfort, and its quiet noise level. On the downside, the tyre's grip on wet surfaces and delayed steering response attracted criticism. Additionally, criticisms from autoklubcr 2023 and adac 2021 tests highlighted imbalanced performance and weaknesses on wet roads.
In Comparison: Both tyres have positive environmental footprints and good mileage. However, the Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro shines brightest on wet roads, differing from the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 which stands out on dry terrains. Both models demonstrated some weakness on the alternate terrain.
Neither of the compared models has been replaced by newer ones, indicating their enduring relevancy in today's market.
In conclusion, choosing between Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro and Kleber Dynaxer HP4 truly depends on your specific needs. Consider the common climatic conditions and your typical driving environment when making your selection. For a more noise-comfortable drive, choose the HP4, but for higher efficiency and better performance on wet roads, the Spirit Pro is your go-to.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro 13.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,3 | 3,4 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,1 | 2,8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,0 | 3,4 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 1,9 | |
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | ||
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,3 | 2,8 | 2,9 | 1,5 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
