• 12 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than BFGoodrich (75%). In this particular case, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 has a better rating of 89% compared to 84% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winter Sport 5 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Dunlop Winter Sport 5 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings.

# Dunlop Winter Sport 5
/89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
/84%

Add to comparison

Dunlop
BFGoodrich
DimensionsR15 - R21 R14 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34.628.9
Dunlop Winter Sport 537.429.2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 237.529.4
Show test details
ADAC
Name RatingEnviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in testdobré22.1
DUNLOP Winter Sport 5
Rating: Good
dobré 2.32.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2.42.7
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in testvítěz testu2+2+11-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Rating: Good
dobré22-22+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: Good
dobré22-1-2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test31,429,2
Dunlop Winter Sport 536,130,7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,229,3
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,825,4
Dunlop Winter Sport 535,326,5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,825,4
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné2+2+2+2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné 22-2+ 2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: Good
dobré2-21-2
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnow
Best values in testvítěz testu2+2+1
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Rating: Good
dobré2-21-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2-21
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRolling resistanceWear
Best values in testpříkladné2+2+11-1
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Rating: Good
dobré2+ 2-2+23+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé23+1-3+2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,127,3
Dunlop Winter Sport 533,627,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,627,9
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné2+1-2+1-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Rating: Good
dobré222+ 2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné 222+ 2+
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné2+2+11-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé23+1-2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: Good
dobré2+ 2-1-2
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné2+2+11-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné 2+ 222-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: Good
dobré22-1 2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,225,9
Dunlop Winter Sport 533,627,6
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,125,9
Show test details