Segment
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium
Comparison: Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Bridgestone (75%). Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2018 185/65 R15 test, where both the SP Winter Response 2 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (70%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 206 | vítěz testu | 67 | 68 | 43 | 19 | 8 | 10 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Recommended | 186 | doporučeno | 62 | 57 | 39 | 16 | 6 | 6 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended | 182 | doporučeno | 58 | 53 | 43 | 15 | 6 | 7 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | Dobré | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 1,8 | 3,0 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 1 | 2 | 1- | 3+ | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 | 36,8 | 28,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||