Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. DoubleCoin DC99 Lowcost
Comparison: DoubleCoin DC99 vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (DoubleCoin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than DoubleCoin (1%). The first tyre test of DoubleCoin DC99 was done in 2023, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the DC99 and the WetProof were tested.
| # | DoubleCoin DC99
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.642. DoubleCoin DC99 38.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | |||||
| DoubleCoin DC99 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 1,7 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | dobré | 2,9 | 2,0 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
