Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP2 vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Laufenn (58%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Presto UHP2 and Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01, the rating is the same - 52%. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP2 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP2 and the S Fit EQ+ LK01 were tested.
| # | Debica Presto UHP2
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Presto UHP2 68 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 | 36,5 | 29,8 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 | 36,5 | 31,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||