Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Debica (67%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has a better rating of 81% compared to 52% of the Debica Presto UHP2. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP2 and the Ventus Prime 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Debica Presto UHP2
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R16 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
1. Debica Presto UHP2 68 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
Debica Presto UHP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Debica Presto UHP2 | 36,5 | 29,8 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,8 | 27,8 | |||||
Show test details |