Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP2 vs. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Goodride (46%). In this particular case, the Debica Presto UHP2 has a better rating of 52% compared to 40% of the Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP2 and the Zuper Ace SA-57 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Debica Presto UHP2
| Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory2. Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Presto UHP2 68 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 | 36,5 | 29,8 | |||||
| Goodride Zuper Ace SA-57 | 37,3 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||