Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Debica (45%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 has a better rating of 88% compared to 22% of the Debica Presto UHP. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Presto UHP and the Pilot Sport 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Debica Presto UHP has C wet grip rating, whereas 84% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 has A rating.
| # | Debica Presto UHP | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP | 36,1 | 32,8 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | 32,1 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||