Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. In this particular case, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 has a better rating of 67% compared to 56% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Intensa UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Presto UHP 2 and the Intensa UHP 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Debica Presto UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (70%) of the Sava Intensa UHP 2 also have A wet ratings.
# | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R17 - R20 | |
Price | Not available in 235/65 R17 (change) | Not available in 235/65 R17 (change) | |
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
Debica Presto UHP 2 | 36.4 | 33.1 | |||||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.9 | 34.4 | |||||
Show test details |