Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Debica (67%). In this particular case, the Michelin Primacy 4 has a better rating of 82% compared to 71% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Debica Presto UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (68%) of the Michelin Primacy 4 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Michelin Primacy 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Interior noise
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
