Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Debica Navigator 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Debica (1%). The first tyre test of Debica Navigator 3 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2022 205/55 R16 test, where both the Navigator 3 and the AllSeasonContact were tested.
| # | Debica Navigator 3
| Continental AllSeasonContact
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow acceleration
Snow braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 102.7 | 104,8 | 104,5 | 102,7 | |||
| Debica Navigator 3 | 98,2 | 96 | 96,8 | 102,7 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 101,8 | 104,7 | 101,1 | 100,6 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
