Segment
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Barum Polaris 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Debica (57%). In this particular case, the Barum Polaris 5 has a better rating of 63% compared to 57% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Barum Polaris 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the Polaris 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 65% of Debica Frigo HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Barum Polaris 5 has C rating.
| # | Debica Frigo HP2
| Barum Polaris 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Barum Polaris 5 14.822. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Barum Polaris 5 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 2- | ||
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,6 | 31,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
