Segment
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
# | Cooper Zeon CS8
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Our tyre test comparisons for today look at two different models: the Cooper Zeon CS8 and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. Manufactured by Cooper and Kleber respectively, both tyres pose interesting attributes that we will delve into in this comparison.
Let's begin with the Cooper Zeon CS8. As a summer tyre made in Great Britain, it has an overall rating of 42%. In the Autobild test, it was positioned 26th out of 53 test subjects. The main drawbacks noted were a significant weakness on dry roads, resulting in a downgrade, and the shortcoming in environmental performance as well as low lifespan. It still performs decently on wet roads but its shortcomings in abrasion, efficiency and sustainability were pointed out.
Now let's shift our focus onto the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. This tyre ranked 14th in the Autobild test amongst 53 tyres and 12th in the ADAC test out of 50 tyres. Given these results, it's no surprise it has a significantly higher overall rating of 76%. Testers praised it for its comfort and low exterior noise, contributing to its stand-out performance. Furthermore, it was noted to be good in terms of lifespan, abrasion and efficiency, positively impacting its environmental balance. However, it did not perform as well on wet roads, leading to a minor downgrade.
In mutual test comparisons, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 clearly performs better on average than the Cooper Zeon CS8. The Zeon CS8's distinct weaknesses on dry roads and in terms of sustainable and efficient performance were offset against Dynaxer HP4's well-rounded performance and only minor issue on wet roads. Overall, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 seems to be the more reliable choice out of the two.
For users seeking comfort and low noise emissions, the Dynaxer HP4 from Kleber would be a good fit. Those opting for Cooper's Zeon CS8, however, should prepare for some compromises on dry roads and in terms of tyre longevity.
In summation, both tyres perform admirably in their own ways, but the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 outshines the Cooper Zeon CS8 in this comparison, taking the top spot in testing rankings and offering better overall performance.
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 70 dB
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,9 | 33,0 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 37,4 | 28,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,3 | 3,6 | ||||
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,1 | 2,8 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,0 | 34,5 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
Show test details |