Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Cooper) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Cooper (32%). Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Zeon 4XS Sport and the Latitude Tour HP were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport has A wet grip rating, whereas 71% of Michelin Latitude Tour HP has C rating.
# | Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
| Michelin Latitude Tour HP
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle
2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Conditionally recommended
1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Conditionally recommended2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Sufficient
1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Rating: Recommended | 132 | 47 | 48 | 14 | 8 | ||
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Conditionally recommended | 124 | 53 | 37 | 15 | 8 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 0,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | ||
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,3 | ||
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Sufficient | 3,9 | 2,3 | 0,5 | 3,1 | 1,9 | ||
Show test details |