Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Bridgestone (75%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has a better rating of 94% compared to 88% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005. The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 235/35 R19 test, where both the WinterContact TS 870 P and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterContact TS 870 P is made in Czech Republic and Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | ||||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 392 | ||||||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Highly recommended | 382 | ||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Test winner | 392 | ||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Very good | |||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Very good | |||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Outstanding | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2 | 2.1 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good | 2.5 | 2.3 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 3.1 | 2.1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2 | 2- | 3+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | 34,9 | 30,5 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 31,4 | 30,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 63 | 64 | 43 | 18 | 8 | ||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Recommended | 60 | 56 | 42 | 18 | 7 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 60 | 64 | 41 | 18 | 7 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | 34,6 | 25,5 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 3 | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2 | 3+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,3 | 9,4 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Very good | 7,5 | 9,4 | 8,3 | 10 | 8 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good | 8,4 | 7,6 | 8,2 | 8 | 7 | ||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 1 | ||||||
Show test details |