Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 860S was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2020 255/55 R19 test, where both the WinterContact TS 860S and the WR SUV 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Continental WinterContact TS 860S dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Nokian WR SUV 4 also have C wet ratings.
# | Continental WinterContact TS 860S
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
Continental WinterContact TS 860S Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 3 | 2 | 1- | 2+ | ||
Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 2- | 1- | 1- | 1- | ||
Show test details |