Segment
2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Yokohama (42%). But when it comes to comparing Continental SportContact 5 SUV and Yokohama BluEarth RV-02, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental SportContact 5 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Gute-Fahrt 2020 215/50 R18 test, where both the SportContact 5 SUV and the BluEarth RV-02 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Continental SportContact 5 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 also have A wet ratings.
# | Continental SportContact 5 SUV
| Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R16 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi dobré + | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: Very good | velmi dobré | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Rating: - | doporučeno - | 3.7 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
Show test details |