Segment
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Falken (69%). The first tyre test of Continental ContiSportContact 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 245/45 R18 test, where both the ContiSportContact 5 and the Azenis FK510 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Continental ContiSportContact 5 has B wet grip rating, whereas 69% of Falken Azenis FK510 has A rating.
| # | Continental ContiSportContact 5
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Continental ContiSportContact 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 | 278 | 146 | 132 | 14 | 10 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 244 | 114 | 130 | 16 | 10 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
