• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs. Falken Azenis FK510

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Falken (59%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK510 has a better rating of 74% compared to 44% of the Continental ContiSportContact 5. The first tyre test of Continental ContiSportContact 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 245/45 R18 test, where both the ContiSportContact 5 and the Azenis FK510 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental ContiSportContact 5 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 also have A wet ratings.

# Continental ContiSportContact 5
/44%
Falken Azenis FK510
/74%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR17 - R22 R17 - R99
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDry
Best values in test2+1-
Continental ContiSportContact 5
Rating: -
2-2-
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Good
22
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test2781461432510
Continental ContiSportContact 5278 146 1321410
Falken Azenis FK5102441141301610
Show test details