Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium
Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2
Table of contents:
| # | Continental AllSeasonContact | Michelin CrossClimate 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this tyre comparison, we will examine the Continental AllSeasonContact and Michelin CrossClimate 2 all-season tyres. Our aim is to summarize their strengths and weaknesses, based on various tests and reviews.
Both tyres have an our rating of 90% and 89% respectively, indicating high quality performance in various conditions. The Continental AllSeasonContact is made in SK, CZ, and FR; whereas the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is made in IT.
In the Tyre Reviews test, Michelin CrossClimate 2 had the best features in Dry braking, Snow braking, Snow handling, and Snow traction. In the Autoklub čR test, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 achieved 1st position with features like Wet handling, Snow acceleration, and Snow traction, while the Continental AllSeasonContact came 2nd, excelling in Dry handling, Comfort, and Wet circle cornering.
The Autobild test placed the Michelin CrossClimate 2 in 1st position, highlighting its Dry braking, Exterior noise, Snow braking, Snow cornering, and Snow traction. Meanwhile, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranked 10th, but still showed promising features such as Snow braking, Snow cornering, and Wet circle cornering.
Several test summaries highlight the performance of the Continental AllSeasonContact:
- Plus: Good handling in the wet and dry, good snow braking and handling, low rolling resistance.
- Minus: High internal noise, weak snow traction, extended dry braking.
Similarly, summaries for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 are:
- Plus: The best snow performance on test by a margin, rivaling winter tyre ability, shortest dry braking with good grip in dry handling, high aquaplaning resistance, low rolling resistance.
- Minus: Limited grip in the wet grip tests with high levels of understeer.
Verdict: Both tyres offer strong performance and have their unique qualities. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 stands out in snow conditions, dry braking, and rolling resistance, making it a superior choice for winter performance. On the other hand, Continental AllSeasonContact performs well in wet and dry handling, and provides comfort, but has some weaknesses in dry braking and snow traction. Overall, Michelin CrossClimate 2 might be a better option for those looking for enhanced safety and performance in snowy conditions, while Continental AllSeasonContact can be a suitable choice for drivers focusing on handling and comfort.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner
Worst rating in test
2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 102.7 | 104,8 | 104,5 | 102,7 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 101,8 | 104,7 | 101,1 | 100,6 | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 102.7 | 102,5 | 104,5 | 102,1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 45,8 | 48,9 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 39,9 | 49,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 1- | 3 | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 1- | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 63 | 64 | 46 | 19 | 9 | ||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Recommended | 57 | 60 | 42 | 18 | 7 | ||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Highly recommended | 63 | 59 | 46 | 19 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 42,3 | 53 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37,6 | 53,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: - | 1 | ||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||