Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium
Comparison: Ceat SportDrive SUV vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Ceat) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Ceat (47%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has a better rating of 89% compared to 51% of the Ceat SportDrive SUV. The first tyre test of Ceat SportDrive SUV was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 235/55 R19 test, where both the SportDrive SUV and the Potenza Sport were tested.
| # | Ceat SportDrive SUV
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good2. Ceat SportDrive SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Ceat SportDrive SUV Satisfactory
Offroad
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Ceat SportDrive SUV Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | ||||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
